The high speed wave of mass layoffs is haunting 2025, as companies across industries continue to slash jobs in a bid to cut costs and boost efficiency. The past year alone witnessed over 15,000 job cuts across 549 companies, and the trend shows no signs of slowing down. In just the first few months of 2025, pink slips are flying left, right, and center, leaving employees anxious and uncertain about their future.
The latest to join the layoff spree is Amazon, which has announced plans to cut 14,000 managerial positions by early 2025. The move is expected to save the company between $2.1 billion and $3.6 billion annually, but at what cost? With the global economic ecosystem still fragile and inflationary pressures mounting, many fear that 2025 could be the toughest year yet for job security.
While some argue that these job cuts are necessary adjustments in an evolving economy, others see them as a brutal manifestation of corporate greed, where companies prioritize shareholder returns over employee welfare. This trend raises a critical question – are we heading toward an era where job stability becomes a luxury?
Efficiency or Corporate Greed?
Amazon’s decision to cut 14,000 managerial roles is part of CEO Andy Jassy’s broader strategy to streamline decision-making and boost efficiency. The layoffs will reduce the company’s global management workforce by 13%, bringing the total number of managers down from 105,770 to 91,936. While Amazon positions this as an effort to reduce bureaucracy and improve workflow speed, critics argue that it is yet another example of corporate cost-cutting at the expense of employees.
According to a Morgan Stanley analysis, this restructuring will eliminate nearly 13,834 managerial positions, significantly contributing to Amazon’s cost-cutting initiatives. Beyond the layoffs, Amazon has also introduced several measures to curb expenses and increase productivity, including –
—A “bureaucracy tipline” that allows employees to report inefficiencies.
—Restricting senior-level hiring and increasing direct reports under existing managers.
—Reevaluating pay structures to optimize operational costs.
The restructuring is part of Amazon’s larger effort to maintain profitability amid changing market conditions. The company has already scaled back non-essential programs, including its “Try Before You Buy” clothing initiative and a rapid brick-and-mortar delivery service.
Backlash from Industry Experts and Social Media Reactions
Amazon’s latest layoffs have sparked a heated debate across social media and corporate circles. While the company justifies the move as a necessary restructuring effort, many experts and professionals see it as a cold, profit-driven decision that disregards employee welfare.
Akshat Shrivastava’s Criticism – Could Amazon Have Chosen a Different Path?
Wisdom Hatch founder Akshat Shrivastava took to social media to question Amazon’s decision, speaking about its massive $100 billion cash reserves. In a scathing critique, he pointed out that rather than firing 14,000 managers, Amazon could have instead – invested in bonds at a 5% interest rate, generating $5 billion in wealth annually and used just a fraction of these reserves to pay each laid-off manager $350,000 and allow them to retain their jobs.
Yet, as Shrivastava put it, “They won’t do any of that.” Instead, the e-commerce giant has chosen to eliminate jobs while benefiting from global tax breaks.
Taking a broader economic perspective, Shrivastava compared the situation in India and the US, pointing out that American workers at least have some level of social security. In contrast, in India, losing a job could mean financial devastation – “If for some reason you can’t find a job for five years, you could end up on the road.”
This, he argued, explains why many Indians focus on building personal wealth, seeking opportunities abroad, and minimizing taxes because in a system where job security is fragile, self-preservation becomes the top priority.
Gurmeet Chadha – “Corporate Jargon Can’t Hide Job Cuts”
Amazon’s layoffs also drew sharp criticism from Complete Circle CIO Gurmeet Chadha, who mocked corporate jargon that attempts to soften the blow of mass firings.
In a fiery post on X (formerly Twitter), Chadha called out the hypocrisy of corporate culture, where companies use terms like “People Experience Head” and “Chief People Officer”, while simultaneously firing thousands.
“Amazon is laying off 10,000 more people after laying off 18,000 in November. They call their HR heads ‘People Experience Head’… Employees are called families. Sab drama!!”
Chadha also took issue with the role of AI and automation in job cuts, arguing that disruptive technology should not come at the cost of people’s livelihoods.
“AI or any disruption which brings misery to your own people is useless.”
Quoting Guru Nanak Dev’s philosophy of ‘Sarbat da bhala’ (welfare of all), Chadha emphasized that true innovation should keep people’s well-being at its core, rather than prioritizing efficiency at their expense.
Siemens to Cut 5,600 Jobs Amid Slump in Industrial Automation
Continuing with out layoff story, Siemens has announced plans to cut 5,600 jobs at its Digital Industries division, citing weak global demand. This move marks the largest round of layoffs at the company since 2017 and comes as Germany’s industrial sector struggles with declining orders.
The job cuts represent over 8% of the 68,000-strong workforce at Digital Industries. A significant portion -2,600 jobs -will be slashed in Germany, though Siemens insists it remains committed to its home market. The layoffs are part of a broader strategy to align production capacity with slowing market conditions, particularly in Germany and China.
Digital Industries was once a high-margin powerhouse for Siemens, leading in factory software and automation solutions. However, the company revealed that muted demand in key markets and rising competition have significantly dented its orders and revenue over the past two years.
These job cuts had been signaled as early as November, but the full extent became clear after Siemens’ latest quarterly report showed a one-third drop in Digital Industries’ profit.
Adding to the wave of layoffs across Germany’s industrial sector, the news follows Volkswagen’s Audi announcing 7,500 job cuts in administration on Monday. Meanwhile, Volkswagen itself is undergoing a 35,000-job cost-cutting drive, and Porsche has outlined plans to reduce its workforce by 3,900 employees.
Siemens also revealed separate layoffs in its electric vehicle charging business, cutting 450 jobs—about a third of its workforce in that sector.
Siemens Justifies Job Cuts, But Unions Push Back
Siemens board member Cedrik Neike defended the restructuring, emphasizing the need for speed, agility, and regional balance in automation.
“We need to become more regionally balanced and expand our customer base,” Neike told Handelsblatt, adding that Siemens aims to increase its presence in India, the U.S., aerospace, and defense industries.
However, German trade union IG Metall strongly criticized the decision, arguing that it undermines employee trust.
“Transformation isn’t achieved through downsizing but through development and training,” said Juergen Kerner, IG Metall’s vice chairman and a member of Siemens’ supervisory board.
Novartis to Lay Off 427 Employees in New Jersey
In a separate corporate shakeup, Novartis is set to cut 427 jobs at its East Hanover, New Jersey site, home to its U.S. headquarters. The layoffs, which were disclosed in a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) filing, will begin in mid-June and continue through late October.
Novartis attributed the cuts to a revamp of its cardiovascular commercialization strategy, aimed at simplifying and strengthening its customer engagement.
The company plans to implement the new structure by April 1, with affected employees encouraged to apply for other positions within the organization.
Morgan Stanley to Cut 2,000 Jobs in Cost-Saving Drive
Morgan Stanley is set to lay off approximately 2,000 employees later this month as part of an effort to streamline operations and control costs, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Tuesday.
The job cuts, which will affect 2% to 3% of the bank’s workforce (excluding financial advisers), are primarily aimed at improving efficiency, the source said, requesting anonymity. Morgan Stanley, which employed over 80,000 people globally as of 2024, clarified that the layoffs are not tied to current market conditions.
According sources, some of the job reductions are performance-related, while others stem from strategic shifts in workforce locations. Despite initial optimism following Trump’s election, Wall Street’s anticipated capital markets rebound has yet to materialize, as businesses remain cautious due to ongoing policy uncertainties and tariff threats.
Morgan Stanley Co-President Daniel Simkowitz acknowledged at a recent conference that equity offerings and mergers & acquisitions remain sluggish, stating, “The bar is high because of policy uncertainties.”
The move comes amid a broader wave of layoffs across Wall Street, with major financial firms tightening their belts in response to economic uncertainty. Goldman Sachs has accelerated its annual performance reviews and plans to cut 3% to 5% of its workforce. Similarly, Bank of America recently eliminated 150 junior investment banking roles.
Intel Faces Potential Layoffs Under New CEO Lip-Bu Tan
Meanwhile, Intel’s new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, is wasting no time in signaling significant changes to the company’s structure as he takes the helm. Facing mounting financial pressures, Tan is prioritizing efficiency by streamlining operations—a strategy that could result in layoffs, particularly within middle management, as part of his efforts to enhance decision-making and performance.
Reports indicate that Tan, who officially assumed the CEO role on Tuesday, addressed employees in a company-wide meeting, warning of tough decisions ahead. Intel’s focus on eliminating redundant roles is reportedly a response to concerns over bureaucratic inefficiencies, with layoffs seen as a necessary step to restore the company’s agility in the fast-paced chip and AI markets.
AI-Driven Layoffs Threaten Bengaluru’s Tech Industry
Back home, Bengaluru, India’s technology capital, is facing an escalating employment crisis as mass layoffs hit the IT sector, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence and automation.
Industry reports suggest that in the coming months, job losses in Bengaluru’s IT sector could be widespread, with lower-wage employees being the most vulnerable. The wave of job cuts is raising concerns about the city’s economic stability and the future of traditional IT roles as companies shift toward AI-driven efficiencies.
)
The Last Bit. Bracing for the Pink Slip Era; A Global Layoff Tsunami
The writing is on the wall, layoffs are no longer industry-specific or a temporary blip; they are a grim reality across global markets, spanning finance, technology, manufacturing, and even elite corporate roles.
Whether it’s Wall Street giants like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs trimming their workforce, Intel reshuffling under new leadership, or Bengaluru’s once-thriving IT sector now struggling with AI-driven job losses, the message is loud – the corporate world is in the midst of a structural employment reset.
Even the crème de la crème of talent, MBA graduates from Harvard, Stanford, and Wharton are struggling to find jobs, proving that no degree, no pedigree, and no sector is immune to the evolving job market pressures.
Even as businesses prioritizing efficiency over headcount and automation replacing traditional roles, the dreaded pink slip could come knocking when you least expect it – So, how do we brace for impact?
Reskilling Is No Longer Optional: The demand for AI, data science, and automation expertise is skyrocketing; therefore, upskilling in future-proof industries is the best hedge against job uncertainty.
Diversification Is Key: Relying solely on one job or industry is risky, perhaps, exploring side gigs, freelancing, or entrepreneurship can provide a safety net.
Financial Preparedness: With job security dwindling, having an emergency fund that covers at least six months of expenses is no longer a luxury, it’s a necessity.
Adaptability Will Determine Survival: The workforce of the future belongs to those who can pivot quickly, whether it’s shifting industries, learning new skills, or embracing gig work, adaptability is the new job security.
We are today, unfortunately, witnessing an employment dynamics where corporate loyalty is dead, and job security is an illusion. Thus, the real question is not if layoffs will happen, but when and how prepared we are, when they do!
